What should our attitude be toward the Jews? — A rational look at the Jewish Question

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 12, 2017

by Kevin Alfred Strom

REVILO PENDLETON OLIVER (pictured above) was my friend and my mentor, and one of the greatest writers of the 20th century, fully on a par with H.L. Mencken, and one of our nation’s most incisive thinkers of any period. This month and next I will be presenting a series of his most important works on this broadcast. Today we begin with an extract of his posthumously-published book, The Jewish Strategy, which I have given the editorial title of “The Jewish Plague, part 1.” This piece deals with the most momentous issue of all time: the challenge to our very existence posed by the Jewish power structure and the ideologies it has spawned. I give you the words of Revilo P. Oliver:

* * *

The Jewish Plague

by Revilo P. Oliver

IT IS A GRIM AND TERRIBLE FACT that most of the members of our own race have had their minds so deformed by centuries of cunning Jewish propaganda that they have been conditioned, as effectively as well-trained dogs, to snarl and bite when their Jewish masters utter certain key-words, such as “fascist,” “racist,” and the like, which take the place of the “sic ’em” to which dogs respond.

They are, furthermore, so emotionally addicted to narcotic fantasies that many of them are both unwilling and unable to endure the distress of looking at the real world about them and thinking rationally about it. They understandably prefer to close tightly the eyes of their minds and live in the dream-world of pleasurable fairy tales, such as they heard in the childhood to which they subconsciously long to regress. As Kipling neatly characterized them, “If they desire a thing, they declare it is true. If they desire it not, though that were death itself, they cry aloud, ‘It has never been!'”

It is a tragic and potentially disastrous fact that any candid and reasonably comprehensive analysis of our present plight not only exposes its author to surreptitious or open reprisals, but also alienates many members of our befuddled and perhaps doomed race, making them snarl and want to bite the man who would make them face an unpleasant reality. Many more are so timorous that even a hint of disrespect for Jews sends them running for cover, like frightened cats, lest the Jews punish them for having listened to impious words.

Many members of our race, to be sure, secretly resent their covert overlords and sometimes venture, when alone with trusted friends, to make jests or give other hints that, deep in their hearts, they do not venerate the Jews. And if we observe our compatriots, we eventually come to know of many, often persons of very considerable wealth, who would gladly read forbidden publications, but do not dare subscribe to them, not even through post office boxes and under assumed names, lest the Jews discover their secret disaffection and punish them for their thoughts.

A tiny minority of our people, it is true, most commonly the comparatively poor, who think themselves protected by their obscurity, more or less openly resent the Jewish dominion and, by a nice irony, call themselves “anti-Semitic,” thus thoughtlessly using the nonsense word that strident propaganda has implanted in their minds. Some have sufficiently escaped the contemporary thought-control to dare to use the word Aryan, which is the only convenient and approximately accurate designation of our race, although the Jews forbid us to utter it.

But even these bold spirits are usually ill-informed and prone to strong emotions, sometimes seething with a frustrated hatred of the international race. Although they are few in number, the Aryans who feel real hatred disturb the complacency of some Jews, even in this country, where their increasingly open control seems absolute.

A rabbi, for example, in his column in the Chicago Sun-Times, while not disavowing the great Jewish hoax about the “six million” who were supposedly exterminated by the Germans (and then crawled into the United States), quite clearly warned his compatriots that their clamors about a “holocaust” might give ideas to the goyim and result in the operation of real gas-chambers and in a real purge, if the Aryans got out of control in the United States.

The rabbi is probably an alarmist, but it is true that the ever more blatant arrogance and terrorism of the Jews is arousing hatred in their serfs. It may have been indiscreet of them to erect a monumental “menorah,” thirty feet high, in front of the American White House as a symbol of their ownership at the very time that they deny to the cringing Americans (who once had a country of their own) the right to display a Christmas tree on public property.

And instead of quietly abandoning the absurd hoax about the “six million,” which was devised to pep up the Aryan cattle they stampeded into Europe in 1941, and which has netted them many billions of dollars from the swindled Germans and much more from the rest of the world, they are demanding that the lie be forcibly injected into the mind of every American child. That is certain to increase resentment, as is, for example, their recent attempt to murder a man in Chicago, which, when he was merely grievously injured, they explained by claiming they had mistaken him for a man they intended to murder, it being assumed that since the victim was merely an Aryan dog, that explanation should be sufficient comfort for the other dogs.

Open terrorism, whether violent or pseudo-legal, arouses in some Americans an indignant perception of their formerly concealed servitude. I am reliably informed that a young man in the northeastern (and most corrupted) part of the United States recently read Professor Arthur Butz’s definitive exposé of the “six million” hoax (The Hoax of the Twentieth Century) and promptly resigned his membership in one of our minuscule National Socialist organizations on the grounds that Professor Butz had convinced him that Hitler not only did not kill six million Jews, but did not even try.

Passionate hatred of the Jews is almost certain to be futile, for violent emotions prevent rational thought. Berserkers are excellent shock troops, if they are under competent command, but in all wars, victories are won by generals who lucidly and objectively study the capacities and resources of the enemy and as objectively measure their own. If our race is ever to be liberated from its present masters, our independence will not be won by tirades against the Jews, wild declamations about their wickedness in serving their own interests instead of ours, idle and tautological boasts of our superiority in terms of our own values, or frantic diatribes about a “synagogue of Satan” and a hope that some supernatural power will kindly do for us what we refuse to do for ourselves.

We must begin with a rational understanding of our own situation and of ourselves. We must, first of all, understand that in the real world the only test of biological superiority is the ability of a species to survive and extend its power, necessarily at the expense of other species.

It thus becomes immediately apparent that the international race has very solid grounds for its confidence that it is vastly superior to all other races. Despite the obscurity of their racial origins, it is certain that at one time the Jews must have been a small tribe of barbarians, practicing disgusting sexual mutilations and customs, observing strange taboos, and otherwise resembling mere savages. But that seemingly despicable tribe, by arduous, intelligent, and indefatigable work for more than twenty-five centuries, has, through its own efforts, made itself the major world power today and is not far from its great objective, total ownership of the entire globe. History provides no parallel for that stupendous accomplishment. It must be regarded with respect, even awe.

When we consider this prodigious achievement, this astounding triumph over seemingly insuperable weakness, we must recognize that it was made possible only by that race’s cohesion, a biological virtue that I wish our race could emulate, even though the Jews forbid us to do so.

The Jews have won through their intense racial consciousness and effective solidarity. It is true that there have been violent dissensions among them when their leaders struggle for power, and that in those civil contentions the various factions have often enlisted goyim against each other, but their most violently antagonistic factions have always been united in an underlying hatred of those goyim. When, for example, Jesus ben Simon was slugging it out with his brother, Onias, for the high priesthood in Jerusalem, the capital of their ubiquitous race, both tried to make use of the gullible Seleucids, but there can be no doubt that each regarded the stupid goyim as mere tools, to be broken and discarded when they had served their purpose.

There is still today a certain tension between the avowed Zionists and a minority of Jews who prefer to exploit the subject races tranquilly, and who fear that too blatant assertions of Jewish superiority may make the goyim react, but it is a dispute over means, not ends, and it is noteworthy that the minority is rapidly dwindling as the craven submission of Aryans to even such flagrant outrages as the bombing and strafing of the USS Liberty gives assurance that the beasts of burden can always be harnessed to work for their masters, no matter how much they may be beaten and kicked.

This virtually perfect cohesion, by the way, must in large measure account for the intellectual superiority of which the Jews boast and which, I fear, we must concede when we consider the race as a whole, although it is denied by many of our people, who personally only know Jews who, apart from their undoubted cleverness in making money out of the natives, seem stupid, or who ingratiate themselves with the Aryans among whom they have chosen to reside by blandly professing participation in our culture (and I do not mean that all such professions are necessarily hypocritical).

But, for all practical purposes, the race is today, as Josephus boasted it was in his time, a unit, and it is somehow very ably directed in its predatory operations against other races. How much of this highly intelligent strategy is instinctive and how much is planned by a supreme command, I shall not try to determine; the available evidence is conflicting and not conclusive.

The racial solidarity of the Jews, furthermore, includes such complete subordination of the individual to the race, whenever the welfare of the race is concerned, that it suggests an hyperbolical comparison with the social organization of certain insects, especially some species of ants and bees, in which the individual is virtually a tentacle of a large organism, and it also reminds one of Roderick Seidenberg’s hope, expressed in his Post-Historic Man and Anatomy of the Future (Chapel Hill, 1950 and 1961), that all human species (except the “administrators,” i.e., Jews) can be reduced to mindless automata that operate by reflexes without thought or consciousness, like cockroaches, for example.

These comparisons are, of course, extravagant, but may not be entirely irrelevant. A most impressive example of this racial solidarity is the fact that, as was revealed by a Jew who resided in Germany, J.G. Burg (Schuld und Schicksal, Munich, 1962, with photographs of corroborating documents), the Zionists, after the election of an independent German government under Hitler, tried to incite pogroms and large-scale massacres of the Jews in Germany for the purpose of facilitating the stampeding of Aryan cattle from Britain and the United States to punish the Germans for trying to have a country of their own.

The Germans refused to be incited and the Jewish efforts to procure pogroms were unsuccessful, so it was necessary for them to start the desired war in other ways, and after that war, to devise the “holocaust” hoax. The remarkable thing is that, so far as I know, no Jews anywhere (except Burg) seem at all offended by Weizmann’s admission that he thought the “annihilation of the Jews in Germany” a small price to pay for a Jewish seizure of Palestine.

This is really remarkable in a race so conscious of its solidarity and superiority. It is true, of course, that the British and Americans know that their great War Criminals, Churchill and Roosevelt, deliberately contrived the death of many thousands of Englishmen and Americans to please their Jewish masters and get the Crusade Against Western Civilization under way, and show no resentment of such bloody treason, but they are Aryans, who have been so cowed that they seem to accept their status as an inferior and expendable species.

But when Jews accept a proposal to massacre large numbers of their own people for the benefit of their race, that is significant.

* * *

You’ve been listening to “The Jewish Plague, part 1,” written by Professor Revilo Pendleton Oliver and presented by your host, Kevin Alfred Strom. To read more of Dr. Oliver’s works, visit http://nationalvanguard.org/oliver.

We’ll continue this important discussion of the Jewish Question by classicist, scholar, and teacher Dr. Revilo P. Oliver, next week on American Dissident Voices.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. To help us, send donations to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA or visit natall.com/donate. To order books and CDs from National Alliance books, visit natall.com/shop and for free fliers to spread the truth in your community, visit natall.com/fliers. Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.